Case 2500186/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Willson v North Star Property Services and Solutions Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500186/2022
- Decision date
- 5 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Willson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr A Willson presented a claim on 12 February 2022 that included unlawful deduction of wages under section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996 and a complaint about unpaid holiday pay on termination under regulation 30(1)(b) Working Time Regulations 1998. After the claim was served, the Respondent did not present a response. The Claimant later provided further information and supporting evidence and said that he was content to proceed only with the claim for arrears of pay.
The tribunal decided the matter under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the material available. It was satisfied that there was sufficient information to issue a judgment without a hearing, and the listed hearing for 27 April 2022 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that, as at termination, the Claimant had not been paid gross salary of £2,628.51 for the month ending 15 December 2021 and £960 for the month ending 15 January 2022, making a total of £3,588.51 in unpaid wages. It held that those amounts were properly payable and that the Respondent had failed to pay them in contravention of section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim originally also included accrued but untaken holiday pay on termination, but the Claimant later said he wished to proceed only with arrears of pay. | Upheld | — | £3,589 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,589
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.