Case 2500202/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Brandon Simpson v Signtree Electrical (Skinnergate) Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500202/2022
- Decision date
- 9 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Brandon Simpson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under Rule 21 because the Respondent did not present a response. The Claimant had initially named Sign Tree Developments Ltd, then amended the claim on 5 April 2022 to substitute Signtree (Skinnergate) Ltd as the Respondent. The tribunal was satisfied on the available material that it could determine the claim without a hearing.
The tribunal found that, at termination of employment, the Claimant had not been paid gross salary of £166 in respect of his first week's pay, described as a 'week in hand'. It accepted that this amount had been agreed to be paid on termination and concluded that the wages were properly payable but had not been paid, so the unlawful deduction of wages claim succeeded.
The tribunal also found that the Claimant had accrued 6 days' untaken holiday at a daily rate of £66.88, producing holiday pay of £401.28. It held that the Respondent had failed to pay that holiday pay due under regulation 30(1)(b) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The total amount ordered to be paid was £567.28.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Arrears of pay for the first week's pay ('week in hand') were found to be properly payable on termination and unpaid. | Upheld | — | £166 |
| Holiday pay | The claim succeeded under regulation 30(1)(b) Working Time Regulations 1998 for 6 days' accrued but untaken holiday at £66.88 per day. | Upheld | — | £401 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £567
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulation 30(1)(b) Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.