Case 2500203/2024 · Employment Tribunal
‘A’ v ‘C Ltd’ — 2024
- Case reference
- 2500203/2024
- Decision date
- 4 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram
Parties
2 namedClaimant
‘A’
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 27 November 2024, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated bases were failure to comply with a tribunal order, failure to actively pursue the case, and the risk that, because of the claimant's default, a fair hearing of some or all claims might no longer be possible because of failure to disclose relevant documents and provide evidence.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 9 to 13 December 2024 did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim after the claimant failed to make representations, or sufficient representations, in response to the tribunal's letter of 27 November 2024 giving an opportunity to explain why strike out should not occur for non-compliance, failure to actively pursue the case, and/or because a fair hearing might no longer be possible due to failure to disclose relevant documents and evidence. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.