Case 2500204/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S D Wood v W. Liddy & Co. Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2500204/2020
- Decision date
- 20 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S D Wood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr S D Wood confirmed he had been paid in lieu of notice. On that basis, the tribunal noted that the claim described as breach of contract/wrongful dismissal was dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant.
The order expressly stated that this disposal did not affect the remaining claims under the same case number. No separate merits findings, liability findings, or monetary award are set out in this one-page judgment for those remaining claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that, after the Claimant confirmed he had been paid in lieu of notice, the claim of breach of contract/wrongful dismissal was dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. The order also says this did not affect the remaining claims under the same case number. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.