Case 2500206/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Brown v Praxis Facilities Management Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2500206/2025
- Decision date
- 24 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle CFCTC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Brown
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Newcastle CFCTC by CVP on 24 February 2025 before Employment Judge Arullendran. The claimant did not attend. The respondent, Praxis Facilities Management Limited, was represented by counsel. The judgment amends the respondent's title to Praxis Facilities Management Limited.
The tribunal dismissed all claims brought by the claimant in accordance with Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because the claimant failed to attend the hearing. The written record also states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons will be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment does not set out separate substantive findings on the claim; it states that all claims were dismissed under Rule 47 because the claimant failed to attend the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of The Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.