Case 2500207/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Russell v EE Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500207/2022
- Decision date
- 5 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Langridge REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Russell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal considered the timeliness of the claimant's constructive unfair dismissal, unlawful deductions from wages, and disability discrimination claims. The constructive unfair dismissal claim was not made within the time limit in section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and the unlawful deductions claim was not brought within the time limits in section 23 of that Act.
For both the unfair dismissal and unlawful deductions claims, the Tribunal found that it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have brought the claims in time. The Tribunal therefore found that it had no jurisdiction to hear those claims.
The disability discrimination claim under the Equality Act 2010 was also brought outside the section 123 time limit. The Tribunal found that it was not just and equitable to extend time, so it had no jurisdiction to hear that claim. All claims were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment described this as a claim of constructive unfair dismissal under the Employment Rights Act 1996 and dismissed it because it was out of time and the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed because the claim was not brought within the time limits in section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed because the disability discrimination claim was not brought within the section 123 Equality Act 2010 time limit and it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 111 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- reasonably practicable
- section 123 Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.