Case 2500218/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Barber v EGGER (UK) Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2500218/2019
- Decision date
- 7 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Members
- Venue
- North Shields Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Barber
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short judgment at North Shields Hearing Centre on 7 May 2019 before Employment Judge Arullendran. The claimant, Mr A Barber, appeared through his daughter, and the respondent, EGGER (UK) Limited, was represented by a solicitor.
The only recorded claim was unlawful discrimination on the grounds of age. The tribunal did not determine the claim on its merits. Instead, the judgment records that the claimant withdrew the claim in person on the day of the hearing and gave his consent to that withdrawal.
The formal outcome recorded by the tribunal was that the age discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. No findings on liability, remedy, or compensation were made, and no monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The claimant’s age discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant, with his consent to the withdrawal given in person on 7 May 2019. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.