Case 2500228/2014 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs T Smith v Sunderland City Council and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500228/2014
- Decision date
- 6 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs T Smith
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that it wrote to the claimant on 23 May 2019 in connection with the claim. It wrote again on 2 December 2021, giving notice that it had power to strike out the claim because it had not been actively pursued and giving the claimant 14 days to provide written reasons why such an order should not be made.
No reply was received to the correspondence. The Tribunal therefore ordered that the claim be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The gov.uk listing identifies Equal Pay Act; the judgment itself refers only to the claim being struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The gov.uk listing identifies sex discrimination; the judgment itself refers only to the claim being struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The gov.uk listing identifies unlawful deduction from wages; the judgment itself refers only to the claim being struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.