Case 2500231/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Lucy Bailey v Cook’s Café Ltd and Cook’s Café Group Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2500231/2023
- Decision date
- 20 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Loy Appearances
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Lucy Bailey
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Lucy Bailey brought two claims for unpaid holiday pay upon termination of employment, one in case number 2500231/2023 against Cook’s Café Ltd and one in case number 2500232/2023 against Cook’s Café Group Ltd. The hearing took place at Newcastle on 20 September 2023 before Employment Judge Loy. The claimant did not appear and was not represented; Mr P Charlton, director of both respondents, appeared for the respondents.
The tribunal held in both cases that the claim for unpaid holiday pay upon termination of employment was not well-founded and failed. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of sending the written record of the decision. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claim number 2500231/2023: unpaid holiday pay upon termination of employment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim number 2500232/2023: unpaid holiday pay upon termination of employment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.