Case 2500233/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs H Forrest v The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue & Customs — 2023
- Case reference
- 2500233/2022
- Decision date
- 22 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Langridge Members
- Venue
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Mrs A Tarn, Mr M Gallagher
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs H Forrest
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal held that the claimant's claims were brought within the time limit in section 123 of the Equality Act 2010.
The Tribunal dismissed the claimant's direct disability discrimination claim under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010, indirect sex discrimination claim under section 19, and indirect age discrimination claim under section 19. The written judgment records the outcomes only; reasons were given orally and no written reasons are included in the supplied judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claim described as direct disability discrimination under section 13 Equality Act 2010; it failed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Sex discrimination | Claim described as indirect sex discrimination under section 19 Equality Act 2010; it failed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Age discrimination | Claim described as indirect age discrimination under section 19 Equality Act 2010; it failed. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 123 Equality Act 2010
- section 13 Equality Act 2010
- section 19 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.