Case 2500238/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Williams v 700 Club — 2024
- Case reference
- 2500238/2024
- Decision date
- 5 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moss Appearances
- Venue
- Newcastle via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr G Williams attended the hearing initially but did not return after a technical issue. The Tribunal attempted to contact him by telephone and email over a 50 minute period and, when those attempts were unsuccessful, proceeded to determine the claim in his absence.
The only claim recorded in the judgment was wrongful dismissal, identified as a notice pay claim. That claim was dismissed. The short judgment does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the dismissal claim beyond the procedural history and the final outcome.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment states that the claim of wrongful dismissal (notice pay) was dismissed after the Tribunal proceeded in the claimant's absence when he did not return following a technical issue and did not respond to contact attempts over a 50 minute period. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.