Case 2500244/2024 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Mr S Davis (in house representative) PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2025
- Case reference
- 2500244/2024
- Decision date
- 24 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kenward Appearances
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in Manchester on 10 October 2025, before Employment Judge Kenward, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Mr S Davis, the tribunal recorded that at all material times the claimant was a disabled person for the purposes of Equality Act 2010 section 6 by reason of anxiety and/or depression.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The extracted judgment does not record any further substantive findings on liability or any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal found that at all material times the claimant was a disabled person for the purposes of Equality Act 2010 section 6 by reason of anxiety and/or depression. No substantive liability or remedy decision is recorded in the extracted judgment. | Other | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.