Case 2500255/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Burton v So Good Foods Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2500255/2021
- Decision date
- 25 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Burton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs R Burton succeeded on her complaint that So Good Foods Ltd had failed to pay holiday pay due under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The tribunal found that £486.54 remained due to the claimant and ordered the respondent to pay that sum.
The claimant also complained that the respondent breached her contract of employment and/or made deductions from her wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 by failing to pay notice pay. That complaint was not well founded and was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | Holiday pay complaint under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 was found well founded. The tribunal awarded the amount remaining due. | Upheld | — | £487 |
| Breach of contract | The complaint that the respondent breached the contract of employment and/or made deductions from wages by failing to pay notice pay was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £487
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.