Case 2500266/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Theresa McLoughlin and others — 2020
- Case reference
- 2500266/2020
- Decision date
- 3 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Sweeney gave a Rule 21 judgment dated 3 July 2020. The claims against the First and Second Respondent were dismissed. The complaint against the Third Respondent in respect of accrued but untaken holiday pay under Regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations was dismissed on withdrawal.
By consent, the complaint for a statutory redundancy payment under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996 was well founded and succeeded against the Third Respondent. The Tribunal ordered the Third Respondent to pay a redundancy payment of £1,375.50.
By consent, the complaint of breach of contract in respect of failure to give notice was well founded and succeeded against the Third Respondent. The Tribunal ordered damages of £917. The total amount ordered against the Third Respondent was £2,292.50.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment dismisses the claims against the First and Second Respondent, but the extracted text does not specify the separate legal basis for those claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Complaint for accrued but untaken holiday pay under Regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations; dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | By consent, the complaint under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996 succeeded against the Third Respondent. | Upheld | — | £1,376 |
| Breach of contract | By consent, the complaint for failure to give notice succeeded against the Third Respondent. | Upheld | — | £917 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,293
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.