Case 2500270/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs E Pickering v Secret Garden Café Hull Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2500270/2025
- Decision date
- 30 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs E Pickering
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs E Pickering brought an ET1 against Secret Garden Cafe Hull Ltd on 18 March 2025. The respondent did not present a response by the due date of 5 June 2025. The tribunal therefore considered the papers under rule 22 of the Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024 and was satisfied that it had enough material to issue judgment without a hearing.
The claimant had worked 20 hours a week in the respondent's cafe at £11.40 an hour, with occasional overtime, and was paid monthly in arrears. Her gross weekly pay was £228.20. The tribunal found that her employment ended in June 2024 without notice, and that she had not been paid for work done in May 2024 or for shifts worked in June up to the termination date.
For May 2024, the tribunal found that £1,186.90 gross was due and payable on 31 May 2024. For June 2024, it found that £643.50 gross was due for the shifts worked before termination and that payment should have been made on the date of termination or by 30 June 2024 at the latest. Because no payments were made and there was no contractual or statutory authority for the deductions, the unlawful deduction from wages claim succeeded in the gross sum of £1,830.40.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was entitled to one week's notice of termination but had received none. It accepted that damages for the notice claim had to be calculated on a net basis and, on the material before it, awarded £225 for breach of contract. The total amount due to the claimant was therefore £2,055.40.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,830 |
| Breach of contract | Damages were awarded for failure to give one week's notice. | Upheld | — | £225 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,055
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.