Case 2500273/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Marshall v James Lynn Catering Services Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500273/2022
- Decision date
- 3 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Morris
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D Marshall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Newcastle Hearing Centre by CVP and with the respondent unrepresented and no response having been received, found three claims well-founded. It held that James Lynn Catering Services Ltd breached Mrs D Marshall's contract of employment by not giving her the one week's notice of termination to which she was entitled under the contract and section 86 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal also upheld the complaint under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages contrary to section 13. The deductions were the failure to pay the claimant at all for the first and last months of her employment, identified in the judgment as £650.43 and £864.27.
A further claim succeeded under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The tribunal found that, on termination of employment, the claimant had 43.4 hours of accrued but untaken paid holiday for which she had not been compensated. It awarded £386.69 for that entitlement.
The judgment records that the breach of contract award of £209.56 was calculated by reference to net pay, with liability for income tax or national insurance contributions falling on the respondent alone. The wage and holiday pay awards of £1,514.70 and £386.69 were calculated by reference to gross pay, with any liability for income tax or employee's national insurance contributions falling on the claimant alone.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Complaint that the respondent failed to give one week's notice of termination required by the contract and section 86 ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £210 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint under section 23 ERA 1996 that the respondent made unauthorised deductions by not paying wages at all for the first and last months of employment. | Upheld | — | £1,515 |
| Working time regulations | Complaint under regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998 for accrued but untaken holiday pay at termination, assessed at 43.4 hours. | Upheld | — | £387 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,111
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 86 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.