Case 2500277/2024 · Employment Tribunal
G Liddle v NTRS (Durham) Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2500277/2024
- Decision date
- 13 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
G Liddle
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Newcastle by video on 13 June 2024 before Employment Judge Aspden, dealt with a claim by G Liddle against NTRS (Durham) Limited (in voluntary liquidation). It held that the complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay was well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay £2,980.22 as damages for breach of contract.
The tribunal also determined under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996 that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £10,146, which the respondent was ordered to pay. It further found that the complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded and stated that the claimant was unfairly dismissed.
The judgment records that, in light of the awards set out above, no compensation for unfair dismissal was claimed or awarded. The total monetary award on the face of the decision is £13,126.22, comprising the notice pay damages and redundancy payment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay was held well-founded; the respondent was ordered to pay £2,980.22 as damages. | Upheld | — | £2,980 |
| Redundancy | Under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996, the claimant was found entitled to a redundancy payment of £10,146. | Upheld | — | £10,146 |
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint was well-founded and the claimant was found to have been unfairly dismissed, but the judgment recorded that no compensation for unfair dismissal was claimed or awarded. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,126
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.