Case 2500282/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. J Young v Sunderland Association Football Club Ltd. — 2024
- Case reference
- 2500282/2024
- Decision date
- 4 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gowland Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle CFCTC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. J Young
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 4 July 2024 at Newcastle CFCTC by CVP, Employment Judge Gowland decided that Mr Young’s claims for unauthorised deduction from wages and breach of contract were out of time. The judgment states that the Employment Tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear either claim because they were presented outside the relevant time limit.
The tribunal found that it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have submitted the claims within time, and it heard no evidence that would justify extending the relevant time limits in this case. The decision records that the reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within the stated period.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim held out of time; the tribunal found it had no jurisdiction to hear the claim and declined any extension of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim held out of time; the tribunal found it had no jurisdiction to hear the claim and declined any extension of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.