Case 2500283/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. J Wilson v Mediaworks UK Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2500283/2020
- Decision date
- 26 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A.M.S. Green
- Venue
- Newcastle-Upon-Tyne
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. J Wilson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed Mr Wilson's claims for breach of contract (notice pay), unlawful deduction from wages, and holiday pay. It found that his contract did not contain a garden leave clause and that there was no written or oral collateral agreement placing him on garden leave when he resigned on 2 December 2019.
Instead, the tribunal accepted Mediaworks' evidence that Mr Wilson was required to work his notice from home on outstanding projects, including Hive, Efes and an internal HR app. It relied on contemporaneous emails from Mr Tuck on 2 and 4 December 2019 and texts from Mr Blenkinsop on 5 and 11 December 2019, which it said showed that Mr Wilson was expected to work and that the issues were his failure to respond and complete the agreed work. It also found that Mr Wilson had not produced the handover note he said he had been required to prepare.
The tribunal noted that Mr Wilson admitted in cross-examination that he had not told Mr Tuck the truth when he said he was working on Hive. It held that, by failing to perform the work requested during his notice period, he was neither ready nor willing to work and had provided no consideration for wages. Applying the principles it cited on mutuality of obligation, it concluded that there was no unlawful deduction from wages and that Mr Wilson had been in repudiatory or fundamental breach of contract.
On that basis, the tribunal held that Mediaworks was entitled to summarily dismiss Mr Wilson under clause 9.3 of the contract. The letter of 13 December 2019 confirmed termination with immediate effect and stated that the final salary calculation covered 1 to 4 December 2019, including the 2-day accrued holiday entitlement. The judgment dismisses the holiday pay claim without a separate monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice pay / termination damages dismissed. The tribunal found there was no garden leave arrangement, that Mr Wilson was required to work his notice from home, and that Mediaworks was entitled to treat his failure to do so as a serious breach under clause 9.3. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unpaid December 2019 salary / wages during the notice period dismissed. The tribunal held that Mr Wilson was not ready or willing to work, gave no consideration by performing the work requested, and therefore wages were not due. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for accrued but untaken holiday pay dismissed. The extracted reasons do not contain a separate holiday-pay analysis, but the 13 December 2019 letter stated that the final salary calculation covered 1 to 4 December 2019 inclusive of the 2-day accrued holiday entitlement. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- mutuality of obligation
- Carmichael and another v National Power plc
- Miles v Wakefield Metropolitan District Council
- ERA 1996 s.88
- ERA 1996 s.91(4)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.