Case 2500284/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Tiffany v NXN Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500284/2022
- Decision date
- 17 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle CFCTC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Tiffany
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the claim remotely by video on 17 May 2022 before Employment Judge Arullendran. The Respondent, NXN Limited, did not attend. The judgment records that the hearing was not objected to, a face-to-face hearing was not practicable, and the issues could be determined remotely.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim under s.13 ERA 1996 was found well-founded. The award was stated to be a net payment, with the Respondent liable for any tax and national insurance due. | Upheld | — | £775 |
| Holiday pay | Claim under Regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 was found well-founded. The award was stated to be a gross payment, with the Claimant liable for any tax and national insurance due. | Upheld | — | £1,858 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,632
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.