Case 2500287/2020 · Employment Tribunal
N Richardson v Baydale Control Systems Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2500287/2020
- Decision date
- 9 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
N Richardson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the following complaints were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant: direct disability discrimination under s 13 Equality Act 2010, discrimination arising from disability under s 15, indirect discrimination because of disability or pregnancy under s 19, and failure to make reasonable adjustments under s 21.
This was a part judgment dated 9 June 2020 under rule 52. The judgment also stated that the claimant's remaining claim(s) would proceed to a hearing, with the date to be notified in due course.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal on 9 June 2020. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal on 9 June 2020. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Other | Indirect discrimination because of disability or pregnancy under s 19 Equality Act 2010; dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal on 9 June 2020. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal on 9 June 2020. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.