Case 2500291/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G K Suhag v Miracle Centre Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2500291/2024
- Decision date
- 2 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G K Suhag
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr G K Suhag, brought claims against Miracle Centre Limited for unlawful deduction from wages, holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations, and breach of contract in respect of notice pay. The respondent did not attend or represent itself at the hearing before Employment Judge Martin at Newcastle on 1 October 2024.
The tribunal found each claim well founded. It ordered the respondent to pay Mr Suhag £720 gross for unlawful deduction from wages, £507.42 gross for the holiday pay claim, and £444 gross for breach of contract (notice pay). The judgment states that the claimant is responsible for accounting for any tax and National Insurance contributions on the sums awarded.
The total monetary award recorded by the judgment is £1,671.42 gross. The written decision records that oral reasons were given at the hearing, but it does not set out further substantive reasoning beyond the outcomes and awards.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £720 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £507 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £444 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,671
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.