Case 2500292/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Fielding v EE Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2500292/2020
- Decision date
- 1 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Fielding
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. It had written to the claimant on 14 September 2020 giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 21 May 2020 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. The hearing fixed for 8 to 11 March 2021 was therefore vacated.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim was struck out; the unfair dismissal classification is taken from the listing context rather than detail in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment states that the claim was struck out; the pregnancy and maternity discrimination classification is taken from the listing context rather than detail in the judgment text. | Struck out | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the claim was struck out; the sex discrimination classification is taken from the listing context rather than detail in the judgment text. | Struck out | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.