Case 2500293/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K. Hebson v House of Dreams Jarrow Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2500293/2020
- Decision date
- 11 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K. Hebson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Johnson Date found that Mrs K. Hebson's complaint of unauthorized deduction from wages was well founded and succeeded. The respondent, House of Dreams Jarrow Ltd, was ordered to pay £544.50 gross in respect of wages unlawfully deducted.
The tribunal also found that the claimant's complaint of breach of contract was well founded and succeeded. The respondent was ordered to pay £506 gross in respect of notice pay. No other findings, tests, or remedy components are recorded in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the complaint of unauthorized deduction from wages was well founded and that the respondent must pay the gross sum of £544.50 in respect of wages unlawfully deducted. | Upheld | — | £545 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the complaint of breach of contract was well founded and that the respondent must pay the gross sum of £506 in respect of notice pay. | Upheld | — | £506 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,051
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.