Case 2500306/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Z Farooqui v ABBCC Ltd trading as Bombay Curry Club — 2020
- Case reference
- 2500306/2020
- Decision date
- 21 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Shore Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Z Farooqui
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr Farooqui was employed as General Manager by BC (NE) Ltd under a contract dated 5 April 2018, with continuous employment beginning on 17 June 2014, basic pay of £19,344 per year (£372 per week), a holiday year running from 1 January to 31 December, 20 days' annual leave plus public holidays, and three months' notice. It accepted that ABBCC Ltd took over the operation of Bombay Curry Club on 27 August 2019 and that Mr Farooqui transferred to the respondent under TUPE. On the main employment-history issues, the judge preferred the claimant's evidence and the evidence of Mr Alim where it was consistent with the claimant's account, and rejected the respondent's case that the claimant had simply agreed to leave the business.
On termination, the tribunal found that the claimant continued to work after the August 2019 transfer, that in September 2019 he was told his services were no longer required, and that he was then told approximately two weeks later that he was dismissed with immediate effect. The effective date of termination was found to be 18 October 2019. The tribunal also found that he took no paid leave during 2019, that 23 days of holiday had accrued and remained unpaid, and that the relevant daily rate of pay was £74.40 gross.
The unauthorised deduction of wages claim failed because the tribunal found the claimant was paid to his effective date of termination, so the wages paid to him were not less than the wages he should have been paid. The breach of contract claim succeeded for failure to pay notice pay, with £4,836 awarded for 13 weeks at £372 per week, and the Working Time Regulations claim succeeded for unpaid holiday pay, with £1,711.20 awarded for 23 days at £74.40 per day. The total payable was £6,547.20 gross, less tax and National Insurance.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant was paid to his effective date of termination, so the wages paid were not less than the wages he should have been paid. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The claim succeeded in respect of three months' notice pay under the contract. | Upheld | — | £4,836 |
| Working time regulations | The claim succeeded in respect of unpaid holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £1,711 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,547
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- balance of probabilities
- section 230 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulation 4 of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006
- Article 4 of The Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.