Case 2500311/2021 · Employment Tribunal

Mrs A Upton v Tamaris Healthcare (England) Limited — 2021

Case reference: 2500311/2021
Decision date: 3 July 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Morris

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs A Upton

Respondent

Tamaris Healthcare (England) Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At a hearing on 2 July 2021 before Employment Judge Morris sitting alone, the tribunal determined liability only. It found that Mrs A Upton had been dismissed by Tamaris Healthcare (England) Limited within the meaning of section 95(1)(a) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and that her unfair dismissal complaint under sections 94 and 98 of that Act was well-founded.

The tribunal also rejected the claimant's complaint under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages contrary to section 13 of that Act. That claim was dismissed.

The judgment records that the case would be listed for a one-day remedy hearing. No monetary award is set out in this liability judgment.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The tribunal found the claimant's complaint that she had been dismissed and that the dismissal was unfair was well-founded.	Upheld	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was not well-founded and dismissed it.	Dismissed	—	—

Legal tests applied

5 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.