Case 2500323/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Gyunay Hasanov v Prima Nova Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2500323/2021
- Decision date
- 21 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Gyunay Hasanov
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Gyunay Hasanov, gave evidence in person. Prima Nova Limited did not attend, was not represented, and had not filed a response. The tribunal relied on the claim form, the claimant's emails of 6 April and 17 May 2021, and an email from the respondent dated 20 April 2021. It considered section 13(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 for unlawful deductions from wages and regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 for holiday pay.
The tribunal found that the claimant had been employed as a pizza chef from 24 September to 6 December 2020. His net weekly wage was £400 and his daily net wage was £80. It found that wages were regularly paid late, that he was paid two weeks in arrears, and that he did not receive payslips. On the evidence accepted by the tribunal, he was short of £199.40 for his final week, and £241.60 in respect of each of the two weeks held back in hand. After taking account of payments of £150 in January, £150 in March, and £200 on 10 May 2021, the tribunal found that £182.60 remained outstanding and upheld the unlawful deduction from wages complaint in that amount.
On holiday pay, the tribunal found that the claimant took no holidays during the employment and accrued 5.7 days' leave. Using the daily rate of £80, it calculated that £456 was due in respect of accrued but untaken leave and upheld the Working Time Regulations complaint for that sum.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The reasons record that the claimant was still owed £182.60 after partial payments of £150 in January, £150 in March, and £200 on 10 May 2021. The text also contains a date inconsistency: the employment period is given as 24 September to 6 December 2020, but the claimant is said to have handed in his notice in early December 2021. | Upheld | — | £183 |
| Working time regulations | Holiday pay was awarded for 5.7 days accrued but untaken leave at a daily rate of £80, under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £456 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £639
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 13(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.