Case 2500326/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Humphrey v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 2500326/2020
- Decision date
- 16 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Date
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr P Humphrey
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a response, and the Employment Judge entered default judgment on liability only on the information available. The tribunal held that the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint was well founded and succeeded.
The tribunal also held that the claimant's complaint for failure to pay an amount due under regulation 14(2) or regulation 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998, described in the judgment as holiday pay, was well founded and succeeded.
No remedy was determined at this stage. The judgment states that the hearing listed on 22 June 2020 would be converted to a remedy hearing to consider what, if any, remedy should be awarded to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Default judgment on liability only; remedy was deferred to a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment found the complaint under regulation 14(2) or regulation 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 well founded; remedy was deferred to a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.