Case 2500330/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Louise Douglas (First Claimant) Ms Carol Ann Graham (Second Claimant) v Children4us Childcare Ltd (in liquidation) Heard: Remotely (in public by video) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500330/2020
- Decision date
- 4 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shore Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Louise Douglas (First Claimant) Ms Carol Ann Graham (Second Claimant)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 4 March 2022, the tribunal recorded that Louise Douglas's claim of unauthorised deduction of wages under s.13 ERA 1996 succeeded, and awarded her £286 gross calculated as 10 hours at £8 per hour on 1 and 3 October 2019, 5 hours at £8 per hour on 4 October 2019, and £86 overtime. Her holiday pay claim also succeeded, with £880 gross for 11 days' holiday accrued but not taken at £80 per day. Her unfair dismissal claim succeeded and the tribunal awarded a basic award of £960, calculated as 3 weeks' pay at £320 per week; the recoupment provisions in the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker's Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996 did not apply.
Douglas also succeeded on her breach of contract claim for failure to pay notice pay, and was awarded £1,280 gross, calculated as 4 weeks' pay at £320 per week. The written record does not set out any compensatory award or interest. It records that her claims for failure to provide payslips / unnotified deduction under s.8 and s.12 ERA 1996, and for unlawful deduction of employee and employee pension contributions and NI contributions under s.13 ERA 1996 and/or breach of contract, were dismissed upon withdrawal.
Carol Graham was granted permission to amend her case to add a holiday pay claim, and that claim succeeded. The tribunal awarded her £1,108.35 gross, calculated as 13.5 days' holiday accrued but not taken at £82.10 per day. Her unfair dismissal claim also succeeded, with a basic award of £739.90 calculated as 3 weeks' pay at £246.30 per week, and the recoupment provisions were again held not to apply.
The written record also states that Graham's remaining claims for failure to provide payslips / unnotified deduction under s.8 and s.12 ERA 1996, unlawful deduction of employee and employee pension contributions and NI contributions under s.13 ERA 1996 and/or breach of contract, unlawful deductions in respect of salary and SSP under s.13 ERA 1996 and/or breach of contract, and failure to make reasonable adjustments under ss.20 and 21 EqA 2010, were dismissed upon withdrawal. The record gives the outcomes and calculations but does not provide fuller written reasons, which were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
12 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £286 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £880 |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £960 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,280 |
| Other | First claimant's claim for failure to provide payslips under s.8 ERA 1996 / unnotified deduction under s.12 ERA 1996; dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | First claimant's claim for unlawful deduction of employee and employee pension contributions and NI contributions under s.13 ERA 1996 and/or breach of contract; dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,254
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,700
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.