Case 2500338/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Katherine Lillie v Shergroup Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2500338/2019
- Decision date
- 29 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A.M.S. Green
- Panel members
- Mrs D Newey, Mr S Wykes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Katherine Lillie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Newcastle on 29 October 2020, before Employment Judge A.M.S. Green with Mrs D Newey and Mr S Wykes, the tribunal recorded that Mrs Katherine Lillie's claims for automatic unfair dismissal, ordinary unfair dismissal, and pregnancy and maternity discrimination were dismissed upon withdrawal. The claimant was not present or represented; the respondent was represented by counsel.
No liability findings or remedy assessment were set out in the written record. The note states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Automatic unfair dismissal claim. The tribunal recorded it as dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Ordinary unfair dismissal claim. The tribunal recorded it as dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Pregnancy and maternity discrimination claim. The tribunal recorded it as dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.