Case 2500339/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T Ripley v Mr M Fleming (In Representative Capacity On Behalf Of The Management Committee Of Cleveland Golf Club) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2500339/2020
- Decision date
- 15 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss T Ripley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment records that by a letter dated 8 January 2021 the claimant was given an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because she had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 8 January 2021 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No merits findings or monetary award are recorded in the judgment, which was dated 15 February 2021 and signed by Employment Judge Sweeney.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states only that the claim is struck out; the breach of contract classification is taken from the supplied case context/listing because the short judgment does not set out separate claim particulars. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states only that the claim is struck out; the unfair dismissal classification is taken from the supplied case context/listing because the short judgment does not set out separate claim particulars. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states only that the claim is struck out; the unlawful deduction from wages classification is taken from the supplied case context/listing because the short judgment does not set out separate claim particulars. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states only that the claim is struck out; the working time classification is taken from the supplied case context/listing because the short judgment does not set out separate claim particulars. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.