Case 2500344/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Forster v Fairman Chemists Limited Heard: Remotely by telephone — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500344/2022
- Decision date
- 31 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Shore Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Forster
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a private preliminary hearing by telephone on 31 May 2022 before Employment Judge S Shore. The claimant, Mr D Forster, did not attend. The respondent, Fairman Chemists Limited, appeared by Ms L Haig, Director.
The Tribunal recorded that the claimant’s claims were all struck out in their entirety. The reasons given were failure to comply with Tribunal orders, failure to respond to a strike out warning dated 16 May 2022, and failure to attend the preliminary hearing on 31 May 2022.
The judgment does not contain any findings on the underlying merits of the age discrimination, disability discrimination, race discrimination, unfair dismissal, breach of contract, or unlawful deduction from wages claims. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Struck out in their entirety for failure to comply with Tribunal orders, failure to respond to the strike out warning dated 16 May 2022, and failure to attend the preliminary hearing on 31 May 2022. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Breach of contract | Struck out in their entirety for failure to comply with Tribunal orders, failure to respond to the strike out warning dated 16 May 2022, and failure to attend the preliminary hearing on 31 May 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Struck out in their entirety for failure to comply with Tribunal orders, failure to respond to the strike out warning dated 16 May 2022, and failure to attend the preliminary hearing on 31 May 2022. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | Struck out in their entirety for failure to comply with Tribunal orders, failure to respond to the strike out warning dated 16 May 2022, and failure to attend the preliminary hearing on 31 May 2022. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out in their entirety for failure to comply with Tribunal orders, failure to respond to the strike out warning dated 16 May 2022, and failure to attend the preliminary hearing on 31 May 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.