Case 2500351/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Thompson v Meter Check UK Ltd and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500351/2022
- Decision date
- 6 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Newburn Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle CFCTC
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr K Thompson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr K Thompson was employed by the first respondent, Meter Check UK Ltd. His claim against the second respondent, My Utility Donation Community Interest Company, was dismissed. The judgment does not give separate reasons for the dismissal of the second respondent.
The claimant’s claim for unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of unpaid wages was held to be well founded and succeeded. The tribunal ordered the first respondent to pay £1,336.50 gross, described as 6 weeks' outstanding pay.
The award was expressed as a gross sum, with the tribunal noting that Mr Thompson would be liable to the Inland Revenue for any tax and national insurance due on that payment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim against the second respondent was dismissed. The tribunal ordered the first respondent to pay a gross sum of £1,336.50 for 6 weeks' outstanding pay. | Upheld | — | £1,337 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,337
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.