Case 2500356/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Roe v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 2500356/2020
- Decision date
- 15 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Date
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr J Roe
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a Rule 21 default judgment. The respondent, Reds True Barbecue Limited, failed to present a response and the Employment Judge proceeded on the information available. On that basis, the tribunal found the claimant's complaints well founded and all succeeded.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded as unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | Listed as entitlement to be paid a redundancy payment by the respondent. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Liability only judgment; remedy deferred to a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Liability only judgment; remedy deferred to a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded as failure to pay an amount due under regulation 14(2) or regulation 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.