Case 2500376/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Adsley Ms E L Jaggo Ms S Taylor Mr B Stewart Ms S Abrahams Miss K Faherty v Northumbria Police — 2020
- Case reference
- 2500376/2020
- Decision date
- 13 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Adsley Ms E L Jaggo Ms S Taylor Mr B Stewart Ms S Abrahams Miss K Faherty
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment is headed as a Rule 52 withdrawal judgment. It covers six joined case numbers brought by Mr B Adsley, Ms E L Jaggo, Ms S Taylor, Mr B Stewart, Ms S Abrahams and Miss K Faherty against Northumbria Police. The tribunal did not determine the merits of the dispute.
The only substantive disposal recorded is that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the claimants. No liability findings, factual findings on the underlying dispute, or remedy assessment are set out in the extracted text.
Because the claims were withdrawn, the judgment records no award of compensation or other monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that proceedings in case numbers 2500376/2020, 2500377/2020, 2500378/2020, 2500380/2020, 2500381/2020 and 2500382/2020 were dismissed after withdrawal of the claims by the claimants. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.