Case 2500376/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Reeves v C&P Catering Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2500376/2025
- Decision date
- 30 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Langridge Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hearing Centre via CVP video link
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Reeves
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mrs A Reeves, brought claims for notice pay and unpaid holiday pay. The hearing was at Newcastle upon Tyne Hearing Centre via CVP video link on 30 June 2025 before Employment Judge Langridge. The respondent was C&P Catering Limited, and the claimant was represented by her husband, Mr N Reeves, while the respondent was represented by Ms B Mabika of Croner.
The tribunal dismissed the notice pay claim, recording that it was not well-founded. It then upheld the claim for unpaid holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998. The judgment states that the claimant was entitled to 4 hours' annual leave accrued during her employment and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £45.76, subject to statutory deductions.
The judgment also ordered that the respondent's name be amended to C&P Catering Limited. Written reasons were not provided because the reasons were given orally at the hearing and no request for written reasons appears to have been made within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim in respect of notice pay was found not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998 succeeded. The respondent was ordered to pay £45.76 gross, subject to statutory deductions, in respect of 4 hours' annual leave accrued during employment. | Upheld | — | £46 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £46
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.