Case 2500390/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Haven v International 365 Coaching Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) Heard: Remotely (by video) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2500390/2021
- Decision date
- 2 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Shore Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Haven
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal corrected the respondent's name to International 365 Coaching Ltd (in voluntary liquidation). It found that Ms C Haven's claim for a statutory redundancy payment was well-founded. The Tribunal recorded that her continuous employment began on 1 June 2008 and ended on 2 December 2020, and it awarded 12 weeks' pay capped at £538.00 per week at a multiplier of 1.5, producing a total of £9,684.00. The award was stated to be free of income tax and National Insurance.
The judgment also states that all of the claimant's other claims were dismissed upon withdrawal. The extracted text does not identify those other claim types separately, so they are recorded here as withdrawn rather than recharacterised.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment found well-founded. The Tribunal recorded continuous employment from 1 June 2008 to 2 December 2020 and awarded 12 weeks' pay capped at £538.00 per week at a multiplier of 1.5. | Upheld | — | £9,684 |
| Other | The judgment states that all of the claimant's other claims were dismissed upon withdrawal. The individual claim types are not identified in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,684
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.