Case 2500399/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Dos Santos (1) Mrs M Dos Santos (2) v 808 Leisure Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2500399/2019
- Decision date
- 15 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Morris
- Venue
- North Shields Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Dos Santos (1) Mrs M Dos Santos (2)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the start of the hearing the tribunal refused the claimants' application to amend their claims to add complaints about holiday accrued during 2018 but not taken. It applied Selkent Bus Company Limited v Moore and the Presidential Guidance on Case Management, concluding that the proposed matters were new claims, were outside time, and could have been presented when the original claim forms were issued in February 2019.
The respondent conceded liability for wages for 1 January to 8 January 2019 and for pay in lieu of untaken holiday for the same week. The tribunal therefore ordered agreed payments of £646.15 to Mr R Dos Santos and £600.00 to Mrs M Dos Santos for wages, together with £69.58 and £64.61 respectively for holiday pay.
On the contested issues, the tribunal accepted Mr R Dos Santos's evidence and supporting documents that his employment began on 1 June 2018, not 1 August 2018. It rejected the respondent's case that he had merely been volunteering to help with renovations, relied in part on the Statement of Main Terms referring to 1 June 2018, the work records produced, and the £1,500 payment on 2 July 2018 described in the bank statement as wages. It held that wages for June and July 2018 had not been paid, amounting to an unauthorised deduction, and the parties later agreed the sum payable at £3,166.66.
The tribunal also found that neither claimant had been given clear and unambiguous 8 weeks' notice of termination on 31 October 2018. It considered the meeting notes, the WhatsApp messages, the letters dated 31 October 2018, and the January 2019 correspondence, but held that the respondent had not discharged the burden of proof. It applied the principle that notice to terminate must be clearly communicated and construed strictly against the employer, and on that basis the breach of contract claims succeeded, with agreed awards of £3,449.69 to Mr Dos Santos and £3,240.57 to Mrs Dos Santos.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Mr R Dos Santos; wages due for 1 January 2019 to 8 January 2019. Liability was conceded by the respondent at the hearing and the sum was ordered by consent. | Upheld | — | £646 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Mrs M Dos Santos; wages due for 1 January 2019 to 8 January 2019. Liability was conceded by the respondent at the hearing and the sum was ordered by consent. | Upheld | — | £600 |
| Holiday pay | Mr R Dos Santos; pay in lieu of untaken holiday for 1 January 2019 to 8 January 2019. Liability was conceded by the respondent at the hearing and the sum was ordered by consent. | Upheld | — | £70 |
| Holiday pay | Mrs M Dos Santos; pay in lieu of untaken holiday for 1 January 2019 to 8 January 2019. Liability was conceded by the respondent at the hearing and the sum was ordered by consent. | Upheld | — | £65 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Mr R Dos Santos only. The tribunal found he was employed from 1 June 2018, rejected the respondent's account that he was only volunteering, and held that wages for June and July 2018 had not been paid apart from the £1,500 payment on 2 July 2018. The amount was agreed by consent after the liability finding. | Upheld | — | £3,167 |
| Breach of contract |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,237
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
8 references- Selkent Bus Company Limited v Moore
- Presidential Guidance on Case Management
- Article 3 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- balance of probabilities
- Stapp v The Shaftesbury Society
- Hind Gears Limited v McGinty
- Morris v London Iron & Steel Co
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.