Case 2500415/2021 · Employment Tribunal

Mr S Allen v Jaeger Retail Limited — 2021

Case reference: 2500415/2021
Decision date: 17 October 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Martin Representation

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr S Allen

Respondent

Jaeger Retail Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Mr S Allen brought a complaint under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, alleging failure to comply with the requirements of sections 188 and 188A. Employment Judge Martin found the complaint well-founded.

The tribunal ordered the respondent, Jaeger Retail Limited, to pay a protected award for a period of 60 days beginning on 24 November 2020. The weekly rate used for the award was £584.56, producing a total award of £4,676.48.

The judgment records that the recoupment regulations apply to the award. The prescribed element was stated to be £4,676.48 and the prescribed period was 24 November 2020 to 28 February 2021. Oral reasons were given at the hearing; no attendance or representation was recorded for the respondent.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Trade union	Complaint under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for failure to comply with sections 188 and 188A was found well-founded. The tribunal ordered a protected award.	Upheld	—	£4,676

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £4,676; across all upheld claims

Legal tests applied

3 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.