Case 2500420/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Potensial Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500420/2021
- Decision date
- 28 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Members
- Panel members
- Mr R Dobson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Newcastle Employment Tribunal on 14 March 2022 before Employment Judge Martin sitting with one member, Mr R Dobson. The claimant, Miss S Coulson, appeared in person and the respondent, Potensial Ltd, was represented by Mr Maynell, an employment consultant.
The only complaint recorded in the judgment was discrimination on the ground of religion and/or belief. The tribunal held that this complaint was not well founded and dismissed it. The judgment notes that oral reasons were given at the hearing, but no further findings or remedy award are recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant's complaint of discrimination on the ground of religion and/or belief was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.