Case 2500440/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs G Davies v Dolce Limited Heard: Remotely (by telephone) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2500440/2021
- Decision date
- 2 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Shore Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs G Davies
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing by telephone on 7 June 2021, Employment Judge S Shore struck out the claimant's claims against Dolce Limited in their entirety. The judgment records that the claimant's employment had transferred to another entity on 31 March 2021, as acknowledged in the ET1, and the claimant did not appear at the hearing; the respondent was represented by a solicitor.
On that basis, the tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to hear any claim of the types made by the claimant against a transferor under regulation 4(2) of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006. Because the claims were struck out, no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written reasons refer to the claimant's claims collectively and do not enumerate the heads separately; this classification follows the case listing context supplied with the file. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written reasons refer to the claimant's claims collectively and do not enumerate the heads separately; this classification follows the case listing context supplied with the file. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- regulation 4(2) of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.