Case 2500447/2021 · Employment Tribunal
GORDON ROBSON v Booker Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500447/2021
- Decision date
- 24 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge RODGER
Parties
2 namedClaimant
GORDON ROBSON
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal, sitting as Employment Judge Rodger alone, recorded that the claimant's wrongful dismissal claim was well-founded and upheld.
The Tribunal dismissed the claimant's claim of automatic unfair dismissal and dismissed the claim under the Working Time Regulations 1998, each on the basis that it was not well-founded. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £1,791.28.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment states the wrongful dismissal claim was well-founded and upheld. The award is not expressly itemised by claim, but this was the only upheld claim. | Upheld | — | £1,791 |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment describes this as a claim of automatic unfair dismissal and states it was not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states the claim under the Working Time Regulations 1998 was not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,791
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.