Case 2500453/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Yule v Health Hut Professionals Ltd HELD by telephone at Newcastle CFT — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500453/2022
- Decision date
- 9 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Yule
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was an interlocutory judgment on the respondent's application to strike out the claimant's claims. Employment Judge Aspden, sitting by telephone on 27 July 2022, refused the application. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days.
The decision does not record any findings on the substantive merits of the claimant's case, and it does not identify any remedy, liability finding, or award. It is therefore limited to the procedural outcome that the claims were allowed to proceed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The respondent's application to strike out the claimant's claims was refused. This judgment does not determine the merits of the underlying claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.