Case 2500456/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D White v Homeserve Membership Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2500456/2022
- Decision date
- 19 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden
- Venue
- Middlesbrough
- Panel members
- Mr G Gallagher, Miss B Kirby
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D White
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that Mr D White and Homeserve Membership Limited had agreed terms on which their dispute could be resolved. With the parties' consent, the Tribunal ordered that the proceedings be stayed until 3 July 2023.
The judgment further ordered that the proceedings would be dismissed on 3 July 2023 without any further order unless either party wrote to the Tribunal before that date asking for the stay to be lifted and for a new final hearing date to be arranged. The judgment does not record any findings on the merits, any liability decision, or any remedy figure.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records agreed terms resolving the dispute and orders a stay until 3 July 2023, after which the proceedings would be dismissed unless either party asked for the stay to be lifted. The PDF text does not set out the pleaded allegations or any adjudicated findings; disability discrimination is taken from the supplied gov.uk listing category rather than from the judgment body. | Settled | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.