Case 2500472/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H Creed v North Yorkshire County Council Heard: In Leeds — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500472/2021
- Decision date
- 21 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
- Panel members
- Mr M Lewis, Mr K Lannaman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms H Creed
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Ms H Creed's complaint of constructive unfair dismissal was well founded and succeeded. It also recorded that her sex discrimination complaint was dismissed.
On remedy, the respondent was ordered to pay a Basic Award of £13,719 and a Compensatory Award of £500, making a total award of £14,219. The judgment also states that the recoupment regulations do not apply to the awards made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment records that the claimant's complaint of constructive unfair dismissal was well founded and succeeded. The monetary awards were stated as a Basic Award of £13,719 and a Compensatory Award of £500, totalling £14,219. | Upheld | — | £14,219 |
| Sex discrimination | The claimant's sex discrimination complaint was dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,219
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £13,719
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.