Case 2500473/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss H Bell v Tesco Stores Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500473/2022
- Decision date
- 24 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Pitt Representation
- Venue
- via Common Video Platform
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss H Bell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant did not suffer an unlawful deduction from her wages. The claim was dismissed.
The judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by a party within the applicable time limit. No monetary remedy was awarded or addressed in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written judgment states that the claimant did not suffer an unlawful deduction from her wages and that the claim is dismissed. No written reasons are provided in the supplied judgment text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.