Case 2500474/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Crozier v Osborne Orthodontics Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2500474/2021
- Decision date
- 7 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Morris
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Crozier
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs J Crozier’s complaint under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, that Osborne Orthodontics Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from her wages contrary to section 13, was found to be well-founded. The deductions were identified as relating to salary paid while she attended a training course in July 2019, study days for that course between September 2019 and May 2020, and the costs of attending a professional conference.
Under section 24(1)(a) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the total amount of the deductions, £2,789.16. The judgment states that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint under section 23 ERA 1996; deductions were said to be in respect of salary paid while attending a training course in July 2019, study days for that course between September 2019 and May 2020, and the costs of attending a professional conference. | Upheld | — | £2,789 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,789
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 24(1)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.