Case 2500477/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Clare Moist v Chester Le Street Golf Club Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2500477/2023
- Decision date
- 26 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Clare Moist
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningClare Moist’s claim for unfair dismissal against Chester Le Street Golf Club Ltd was upheld by Employment Judge Jeram sitting alone at Newcastle via CVP on 25 July 2023. The written record states that the claimant was successful on liability only.
The tribunal recorded that both the basic award and the compensatory award were reduced by 100% to reflect contributory fault on the part of the claimant. The written judgment does not set out the underlying award figures, so the public record only shows the 100% reduction and not a stated final monetary total.
The judgment was given orally at the hearing and the written record notes that no written reasons would be provided unless requested in time. No other claims, legal tests, or remedy components are identified in the written record provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal upheld the unfair dismissal claim and stated that both basic and compensatory awards were reduced by 100% to reflect contributory fault on the part of the claimant. No monetary figures were stated in the written record. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.