Case 2500481/2016 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Amess v Sunderland City Council and 3 others — 2022
- Case reference
- 2500481/2016
- Decision date
- 7 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson
Parties
5 namedClaimant
Mr M Amess
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that it had written to the claimant on 17 December 2021 and 18 January 2022 in connection with the claim. It wrote again on 16 March 2022, giving notice that it had power to strike out the claim because it had not been actively pursued and giving the claimant 14 days to provide written reasons why such an order should not be made.
No reply was received to any of that correspondence. The Tribunal therefore ordered that the claim be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment states only that 'the claim' is struck out because it had not been actively pursued; the equal pay classification follows the listing category and is not separately discussed in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states only that 'the claim' is struck out because it had not been actively pursued; the sex discrimination classification follows the listing category and is not separately discussed in the judgment text. | Struck out | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.