Case 2500483/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Mohammed v Miracle Centre Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2500483/2024
- Decision date
- 19 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle CFCTC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Mohammed
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr S Mohammed brought complaints against Miracle Centre Limited for unfair dismissal, redundancy payment, unauthorised deduction from wages, breach of contract in relation to notice pay, and holiday pay. The hearing was remote by CVP on 19 June 2024 before Employment Judge Arullendran. The unfair dismissal and redundancy payment complaints were dismissed upon withdrawal.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in the period 1 November 2023 to 7 November 2023. It ordered repayment of the gross sum deducted, £768, and noted that the claimant was responsible for any tax or national insurance on that amount.
The tribunal also upheld the breach of contract complaint concerning notice pay and awarded £468 in damages. It stated that the figure was calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the claimant would have to pay tax on it as Post Employment Notice Pay.
The holiday pay complaint was also well-founded. The tribunal found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant in accordance with Regulations 14(2) and 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998, and awarded £187.20. The written record states a total award of £1,423.20.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | Dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages found for the period 1 November 2023 to 7 November 2023; award was the gross sum deducted. | Upheld | — | £768 |
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice pay was well-founded; damages were calculated using gross pay to reflect possible tax treatment as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £468 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay complaint was well-founded; the tribunal found non-payment in accordance with Regulations 14(2) and 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £187 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,423
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Regulations 14(2) and 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.